SUPREME COURT SETASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, LUCKNOW BENCH WHEREBY THEHIGH COURT GRANTED BAIL TO THE ACCUSED HUSBAND OF THE DECEASED VICTIM,CONVICTED BY A JUDGMENT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FOR OFFENCESUNDER SECTIONS 304B, 498A AND 406 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) AND SECTIONS 3AND 4 OF THE DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 STAYING EXECUTION OF THE SENTENCES OFIMPRISONMENT OF THE ACCUSED BY HOLDING THAT THE FAILURE TO LODGE AN FIRCOMPLAINING OF DOWRY AND HARASSMENT BEFORE THE DEATH OF THE VICTIM, IS IN OURCONSIDERED VIEW, INCONSEQUENTIAL. THE PARENTS AND OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS OF THEVICTIM OBVIOUSLY WOULD NOT WANT TO PRECIPITATE A COMPLETE BREAK DOWN OF THEMARRIAGE BY LODGING AN FIR AGAINST ACCUSED AND HIS PARENTS, WHILE THE VICTIMWAS ALIVE.
NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET KUMAR 8383098478 , 9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 , 9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com Preet Pal Singh Vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., (2020) 08 SC CK 0015 (SUPREME COURT SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, LUCKNOW BENCH WHEREBY THE HIGH COURT GRANTED BAIL TO THE ACCUSED HUSBAND OF THE DECEASED VICTIM,CONVICTED BY A JUDGMENT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 304B, 498A AND 406 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF THE DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 STAYING EXECUTION OF THE SENTENCES OF IMPRISONMENT OF THE ACCUSED BY HOLDING THAT THE FAILURE TO LODGE AN FIR COMPLAINING OF DOWRY AND HARASSMENT BEFORE THE DEATH OF THE VICTIM,...